{"id":1508,"date":"2018-06-20T19:47:45","date_gmt":"2018-06-20T19:47:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/?p=1508"},"modified":"2018-06-20T19:47:45","modified_gmt":"2018-06-20T19:47:45","slug":"quantile-forecast-optimal-combination-to-enhance-safety-stock-estimation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/2018\/06\/20\/quantile-forecast-optimal-combination-to-enhance-safety-stock-estimation\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantile forecast optimal combination to enhance safety stock estimation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Juan R. Trapero, Manuel Cardos and Nikolaos Kourentzes, 2018, International Journal of Forecasting.<\/p>\n<p>The safety stock calculation requires a measure of the forecast error uncertainty. Such errors are usually assumed Gaussian iid (independent, identically distributed). However, deviations from iid deteriorate the supply chain performance. Recent research has shown that, alternatively to theoretical approaches, empirical techniques that do not rely on the aforementioned assumptions, can enhance the safety stock calculation. Particularly, GARCH models cope with time-varying heterocedastic forecast error, and Kernel Density Estimation do not need to rely on a determined distribution. However, if forecast errors are both time-varying heterocedastic and do not follow a determined distribution, the previous approaches are inadequate. To overcome this, we propose an optimal combination of the empirical methods that minimizes the asymmetric piecewise linear loss function, also known as tick loss. The results show that combining quantile forecasts yields safety stocks with a lower cost. The methodology is illustrated with simulations and real data experiments for different lead times.<\/p>\n<p>Download <a href=\"http:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/Trapero-2018-quantile-forecast-optimal.pdf\">paper<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"SPOSTARBUST-Related-Posts\"><H3>Related Posts<\/H3><ul class=\"entry-meta\"><li class=\"SPOSTARBUST-Related-Post\"><a title=\"Stochastic Coherency in Forecast Reconciliation\" href=\"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/2021\/07\/09\/stochastic-coherency-in-forecast-reconciliation\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Stochastic Coherency in Forecast Reconciliation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"SPOSTARBUST-Related-Post\"><a title=\"OR62 -The quest for greater forecasting accuracy: Perspectives from Statistics &#038; Machine Learning\" href=\"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/2020\/10\/20\/or62-forecasting-stream\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">OR62 -The quest for greater forecasting accuracy: Perspectives from Statistics &#038; Machine Learning<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"SPOSTARBUST-Related-Post\"><a title=\"Elucidate structure in intermittent demand time series\" href=\"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/2020\/05\/25\/elucidate-structure-in-intermittent-demand-time-series\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Elucidate structure in intermittent demand time series<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Juan R. Trapero, Manuel Cardos and Nikolaos Kourentzes, 2018, International Journal of Forecasting.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[55,27,90],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1508"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1510,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions\/1510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kourentzes.com\/forecasting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The constant WPCACHEHOME must be set in the file wp-config.php and point at the WP Super Cache plugin directory. -->